I received an article stating in part...
"The [Texas GOP] platform, 22 pages long,
contains a huge number of planks. Some are amusing -- space-based solar power is apparently important enough to be
mentioned twice..."
...to which I replied, about the author of that
article...
...I'm afraid he's hit just about the sorest
spot he can with me. Please allow me to explain...
The Clinton and Bush I or II administrations
offer stark contrasts: Social issues, like crime and tolerance,
typically improve as the economy improves and typically worsen
as the economy worsens. Desperate people are more apt to do
desperate things, like committing crimes, including hate crimes.
It is no coincidence that the Nazi Holocaust followed horrendous
economic conditions in Germany -- sick minds found scapegoats.
Milestones in the history of the technological
and consequent social progress of civilization have typically
involved harnessing new and efficient sources of power. Homo
erectus gained an evolutionary advantage over other species
with their harnessing of fire. Neolithic settlements were made
possible in large part by the harnessing of beasts of burden.
Ancient civilizations rose on the backs of slaves. Medieval
Europe rose from the Dark Ages in large measure with the
inventions of waterwheels and windmills. The Industrial
Revolution was powered by steam. The automobile age -- the
largest corporations are still GM and Ford -- is dependent upon
fossil fuels (Hussein and Bin Laden wouldn't bother with us,
or we with them, if it weren't for oil). And the Information
Age is nothing without electricity (just ask Silicon Valley
during a blackout).
Fossil fuels are dinosaurs, let alone the
biggest controllable contributor to the Greenhouse Effect and
unhealthful local air quality. Nuclear fuels are too dangerous,
particularly in a world filled with terrorists. Wind-,
geothermal, and ground-based solar-power, too limited.
The only feasible power source for the
advancement of civilization is space-based solar power -- once
the dream of science fiction, for years now in the blueprints of
pragmatic scientists (as funded by both Democratic and
Republican administrations).
As Sherlock Holmes said, "After all the
impossible solutions have been eliminated, the only remaining
solution -- no matter how improbable -- is the only possible
solution."
"Amusing"? Only if war in the Middle East,
ultimately over oil, or the continued destruction of the
world's ecosystems by Greenhouse Gases gone unchecked, or the
continued prospects of terrorists getting their hands on
enriched uranium are "amusing".
Sometimes the most mundane and practical
considerations are the most important.
There is no issue more down-to-earth to me than
the development of space-based solar power. Without it, the
economy of the world will ultimately fail and inhumanity will,
not surprisingly, run rampant.
JFK didn't just send us into space to thumb
our noses at the Russians.