In "Riddle of the Bouchercon is No Enigma" (View,
10/15/86), Anaheim librarian Kevin Moore states that mystery
stories are enjoying an upswing in popularity because "now
we're swinging back to a more conservative society, [and]
people want an ordered society. Mysteries offer that order;
things come out right in the end. It's a puzzle, but a
solvable puzzle." I take exception to her analysis!
What she is saying is that conservatism is
orderly thought; but liberalism, disorderly. Poppycock! Was it
liberalism or conservatism that gave us the chaos of the Great
Depression (and threatens a sequel, because of our destabilizing
federal deficit)? Was it conservatism or liberalism that gave us
the restabilizing New Deal (and offers us a rational way out of
the deficit, with fair and wise progressive taxes, cuts in the
overgrown military budget, and affordable help for the
needy...[which will] maximize the stimulation of the economy)?
By implying that liberal thought is disorderly
thought, Ms. Moore overlooks what liberals stand for: Progress,
intelligently planned ("telesis", as the TV commercials
define it). The proper role of a conservative is to see that "the baby is not thrown out with the bath water"; however,
given this Administration's dismal record on such things as
preserving protections for human rights and for the environment,
against the onslaughts of progress not intelligently planned, it
seems as if conservatives are not the conservationists, in
matters both ecological and sociological, that they should be:
It appears that it is conservative thought that, at least for
now, is reckless, disorderly thought.
However, I must make my peace with Ms. Moore -- I have to agree with her final analysis of the popular appeal of
mysteries: "They're so much fun!"