The
                Reagan Administration's loyalty to what they consider
                America's old "loyal" friend, Ferdinand Marcos, is in
                itself admirable. However, our unilateral offer of
                political asylum to him is a grave mistake.
                American hostages were taken in Iran because we
                had granted the Shah, our old "loyal" friend, political
                asylum and we refused to extradite him, admittedly back to a
                kangaroo court. The lesson we should have learned -- and
                apparently we have not -- is that we should not unilaterally
                offer political asylum to a former dictator unless we wish to
                alienate ourselves from the new government.
                Although this may seem like a diplomatic fine
                point, it is precisely why the Iranians now see us as the Great
                Satan -- accessories not only before but also after the fact in
                the Shah's torturous oppression -- whereas the Haitians now
                see us as saviors: We were continually working with the new
                government to make the deal in which it came into power and "Baby Doc" was flown out, by us
                -- we were rightfully
                viewed as liberators, not co-conspirators.
                In the Philippines, the Reagan
                Administration's tardiness in condemning the corrupt Marcos
                regime has complicated the volatile situation, at least in the
                eyes of the new, legitimate Filipino powers-that-be; but we can
                still steer our way through the difficult diplomatic straits.
                In order to formally acknowledge the legitimacy
                of the new government and to secure our own military bases there
                as well as to work for a peaceful resolution of the current
                crisis, we should not unilaterally offer Marcos political
                asylum: Instead, we should firmly but diplomatically ask
                the new government if they would agree in writing, in the
                influential international media, to respect our asylum, by not
                later asking for the extradition of Mr. Marcos, for the
                prosecution that President Aquino promised the Filipino voters
                during her election campaign. In return, Marcos would be more
                apt to abdicate, defusing the bloody, growing civil war, which
                is our stated goal in our now, unilaterally offering asylum to
                him.
                To avoid a near-future confrontation with the
                new government, over an extradition of Marcos, we must
                get their agreement up front -- after all, the disposition of
                the cases against Marcos is an internal Filipino matter.
                We have "kissed up" to a dictator for decades to maintain
                our very strategic bases in the Philippines -- it would be no
                disgrace to now cooperate with the democratic government, in
                whose hands the fate of our bases now does rest.
                Even though, apparently for our own selfish,
                strategic interests, we have helped prop-up the dictator
                Marcos...for decades, the overwhelming majority of Filipino
                people still consider us Americans as friends -- they, not
                Marcos, are our truly loyal friends!