| 
                 PEACE:
                Foreign Policy & Terrorism | September 8, 2003 
                 
                
                IN
                RESPONSE
                
                TO
                BUSH'S
                SPEECH 
                ABOUT
                THE
                ON-GOING
                WAR
                IN
                IRAQ 
                
                An
                E-Mail to Two Democratic National Committee Members 
                I
                tried to keep an open mind while listening to Bush's speech last
                night; and at first, it reminded me of his speech after 9-11 -- an inspirational, rational call to defend our nation against
                those who did us great harm.  I'm sure that's the effect
                this recent speech was intended to have upon the citizenry, and
                how most people took it...at least at first.
                Upon letting it
                sink in, however, one has to ask -- and this should be the tack
                the Democrats take in dealing with the swing voters -- was Iraq
                really the "central front" of the war on terror? 
                (It would do no good to argue that no one out there does indeed
                mean us no harm)  Or has Bush spent lives, money, and
                international goodwill in the wrong place?  Would not those
                sacrifices have been better made elsewhere?  Would not the
                international goodwill that now even he admits we need have been
                better nurtured than squandered?  He spoke glowingly of
                two-thirds of Al Qaeda's leaders being captured or killed; but
                weren't most of them taken by, or at least with the
                indispensable help of, our allies? 
                We might be able
                to make the case to a lot of people that Bush intentionally
                misled the country into war in Iraq (although there is more than
                ample evidence to support the case, it is hard to impugn a man's
                character, especially if he seems sincere to most people); but
                it is a much easier case to make that even if he meant well,
                Bush made a big mistake:  Saddam Hussein was no saint, but
                going after him was not the best next step in our war on
                terror...and now, we've tied up too many of our resources, in
                military power and tens or eventually hundreds of billions of
                dollars in monetary commitments, to continue the work that needs
                to be done elsewhere. 
                Before, I thought
                that if we suffered another devastating terrorist attack before
                the next election, the people would rally again behind the
                President; but now I'm not so sure -- Bush has put his
                credibility on the line that all the sacrifices we're making are
                making us safer.  But I truly don't believe he's made the
                best use of our resources to get that job done; and I'm sure I'm
                not alone in the belief, that fear. 
                Just so long as
                the people realize we're not trying to make political hay out of
                a life-and-death struggle; rather, we're sincerely trying to do
                the best we can for our nation as a whole, and for
                freedom...which is not just the cause of the GOP but of all
                loyal Americans, Democrats included. 
                Return to
                Archive of PEACE: Foreign Policy & Terrorism
                  
                  
                Home
                | Editor |  Values
                & Issues
                |  Feedback
                | Legal | Links  |